Thursday, August 19, 2021

Microfireflies

I first noticed microfireflies on June 10, 2016, in Washington Square Park. I ended up writing about them in Leave Society, and they're depicted on the cover, though in real life they seem to be colorless or white. Below are all the mentions of them in my book. These passages are in third-person, about a character named Li, but they were written as nonfiction, based on my experiences.

cover by Linda Huang

From page 144:

Supine in Washington Square Park one day, Li saw flitting, ephemeral, glowing dots that seemed not in the air, the sky, his mind, or his eyes. They weren’t the wormy question-mark shapes he suspected were microbes, or the tadpole-like shadows, drifting past in tugs of movement belying their inter-eyeball nearness; the semi-translucent dots seemed to be in every area of empty space but were only visible against sky. They appeared, squiggled rapidly, and vanished, like densely packed fireflies in fast-forward.

Li could see two to four microfireflies, as he termed them, into their world, as if looking into murky water. He saw them focusing five feet above himself, on a cloud, and on nothing. Blowing air at them and waving his hand through them didn’t seem to affect them. He searched “glowing dots in air” and other phrases online but found nothing. He observed them daily in the park. 

Maybe microfireflies were the other-dimensional flickerings of a personal, specieal, or global emergent property. Had humans achieved a sufficient density of interconnection for an overmind to emerge? Individual minds couldn’t exist in the imagination except vaguely and fleetingly, as visitors or observers, but maybe eight billion minds on one planet couldn’t not be volitional and participatory there. 

Maybe an infant overmind, made of minds as animals were made of cells, was self-preservationally downloading partnership ideas into society, in part by sprinkling them over urban parks. 

Page 150:

He fell asleep [supine in Washington Square Park], became a moxic red energy, rising and fast. When he woke, he kept his lids down and saw dark microfireflies, pinpricks of shadow that seemed slower and sparser than when backdropped by sky.

Page 161:

As he walked to a bodega for mineral water, falling snow reminded him of microfireflies. 

Supine in the park the next day, he couldn’t see them at first. After he blurred his vision a little and stopped thinking, translucent, vibrating, meshed hexagons appeared and changed into a teeming layer of curlicuing, light-trailing specks. 

Maybe microfireflies would coalesce into a holographic overlay cognizable into 3D meaning. Already immersed in layered visuals, people would integrate visual language quickly. It could be a transitional ability, something to practice on Earth and take into the imagination.

Page 179:

He walked away and stood in place [on Carp Mountain in Taiwan], flapping for five minutes. He couldn’t see microfireflies, or they weren’t there. The sky seemed empty, lucid, uncharged. 

Maybe the swarming dots of light were an urban phenomenon. One cubic centimeter of urban air contained probably hundreds to millions of molecules of glyphosate, Earth’s most used pesticide, because gasoline, as per the 1990 Clean Air Act, was partly made from glyphosate-filled corn or sugarcane, Li had read. Maybe microfireflies were pesticides, flashing as they got buffeted and interpenetrated by municipal intensities of synthetic electromagnetic radiation—electrosmog—or maybe the overmind was helpfully disassembling toxins into atoms and light.

Page 185:

He lay staring out the window [in his parents' apartment in Taipei], past an elevated train track, at the placid sky, seeing no microfireflies. The clouds seemed feeling-shaped, amorphously morphing.

Page 238:

In late April [2017], after finishing the third, 4.5 percent pruned draft of his book, Li remembered microfireflies. In Washington Square Park, he saw the tiny, lumine orbs, which hadn’t been in Taiwan. Maybe the new property would start in the States, where consciousness had been moiled by decades of larger witting and unwitting doses and mixtures of pesticides, psychedelics, and pharmaceuticals than in any other country. 

Page 295:

Lying on his back [in a park in Taipei], he read a printed draft of Rainbow’s poetry book, which she’d retitled But Did U Die? He underlined “Would u rather be crucified or waterboarded.” He underlined “When I die I will become everything,” put down the paper, and saw microfireflies in Taiwan for the first time. They seemed denser, quicker, and more transient than in New York. 

Maybe the abrupt relocation of metal from the crust to the sky as cities, electronics, militaries, and satellites was visiblizing cosmic rays. Maybe one day the new electromagnetic configuration would chain-reactively destroy everything from the ground to the ionosphere—an instantaneous reset to microbes, plants, insects, subterranean animals, and fish.

Page 342:

[Lying on a beach with Kay in Oahu,] Li saw microfireflies, which he hadn’t thought of yet in Hawaii, and which he hadn’t told anyone about. He described them to Kay, calling them “like tiny tadpoles.” She saw black threads, gray spots, and squiggly shapes that seemed to be in her eyes. Li said he saw those too—question-mark worms and other things—but the dots, which he’d first seen in Washington Square Park in the second half of the Year of Pain, when wonder had flowed as pain ebbed, didn’t seem to be in his eyes. 

Kay saw them. Li said maybe no one could see them unless someone else described them. Kay said Li had seen them. They discussed starting a religion around them. Li would write instructions on how to see them. He’d write what had happened minutes earlier. Gazing at the ocean horizon, he saw the lucent dots for the first time as a static, screen-covering “twinkling,” as Kay was describing them. 

Li said the dots might be the first noticeable evidence of a new emergent property. Maybe the whole solar system, starting with subatomic particles, was immaterializing and would soon vanish in a halved twinkle, then reappear elsewhere and casually perish, like most gametes, or survive to reach millions of dimensions. 

Leaving the beach, Li asked Kay what she’d name the dots. She said “dustwinkling” or “microstars.” Li said he’d called them microfireflies in his notes but liked her names more. “Microstars” reminded him that stars could seem and be minuscule from higher dimensions. “Dustwinkling” sounded calm and friendly.

Out of the 20-40 people I know who've read my book and said things about it to me, only three, I think, have mentioned microfireflies. Sam Pink said he'd seen them since he was a kid, and had only met one other person, in high school, who'd seen them. Tommy Orange and Deb Olin Unferth, during our events, both mentioned them, but didn't say if they'd seen them. I asked Deb if she'd seen them, and she seemed to not have tried. Later, in an email, she said, "I think I saw a microfirefly today. Just one."

Besides my girlfriend, whom the character Kay is based on, and besides Deb, I've only directly asked one other person, I think, about microfireflies. I asked my mom, and she said she'd try to see them, then said, "I have read page 145 for microfireflies many times and go look out of the window to the sky, but all I see is building, is it easier to see in the park or outside with trees and must be very concentrated?"

Three reviews have mentioned them. A Goodreads review said, "I felt happy reading about microfireflies, too, since I think I've seen them as a child, but I've never had any words to describe them, and they've always felt too weird or I've always been too forgetful (since I haven't seen them since I was a childhood) to ever try to write down what they're like." 

Christine Smallwood's review said, "He theorizes that the tiny dots he sees in his field of vision might be proof of an alien overmind settling on Earth." Dean Kissick wrote that he'd tried a "couple times" to see microfireflies, but hadn't seen them, but that one night he saw "a tingling around the leaves on the branches" outside his window. He wrote, "I suspect Lin’s probably just seeing fireflies because of his regular weed and acid consumption, or his long tail of other psychedelic experiences, or the many esoteric practices he details in the book." (An update.)

In a DM on Twitter, someone told me, “I first noticed the microfireflies about 20 years ago. I assume that what we're seeing is the blood flowing in our eyes.” Not counting myself, I see one mention of each when I searching Twitter for microfireflies and dustwinkling. Scott Burton, who interviewed me, said in an email, "I think I also see microfireflies."

A funny thing about microfireflies/dustwinkling is that people who see them can't prove to other people that they see them, and if someone lies that they see them, no one can prove that they're lying. People who don't see them might assume that people who do see them are lying. 

My girlfriend Yuka and I have discussed them for years, and we aren't sure what they are. Have you seen them? What do you think they are? I encourage people to share in the comments section. Thank you for participating in this.

Update: They seem to be "the blue field entoptic phenomenon," caused by the motion of white blood cells in capillaries in front of the retina. Red blood cells—erythrocytes—build up behind white blood cells—leukocytes—because leukocytes (which are larger and rarer than erythrocytes) stretch and slow down when they enter capillaries. The backed-up erythrocytes absorb blue light from the sky or other blue backgrounds, while more light gets through in the space ahead of the leukocytes (where there's a lack of erythrocytes) and also through the leukocytes, so that one sees bright, motioned dots. It's explained more in this paper, which calls leukocytes "water-clear blood cells," this video, and this video.

Backed-up red blood cells block blue light

Seems amazing that we can see the motion of something as tiny as a leukocyte (~1/10th the width of a human hair), and that we can easily discern our leukocyte count, as explained in the first video I linked. 

leukocyte levels (1954 study by Ursula Schmidt-Gross)

I wonder what people throughout history—from before leukocytes were known—have theorized about this phenomenon. I'm open to the possibility that the above isn't the full explanation.

Update 2: Discussed this in a podcast.

Update 3 (October 31): Noticed that when I breathe in and hold my breath, the microfireflies slow down and then mostly disappear. 

Update 4 (December 13): A flaw of the capillary theory seems to be that I see the microfireflies even in the center of my vision. There's no empty area in the center—where there are no capillaries—as would be expected.

37 comments:

  1. i saw them at Half Moon Bay in February 2018

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think i can see them on command. Isn't it just an optical effect? I think the way you see them is, be in a space (or outside) where there can be a foreground and a background. So like, a couch facing a wall, if you are indoors. If you are outdoors, like at the beach, you'd be on the sand looking at the horizon. Then, focus on the space between where you are and the 'background' - the wall or the horizon. You also have to kind of relax your focus; trying to take in your entire field of vision, as opposed to any specific focal point, can help with this. If you do this I think they will pretty quickly start to appear, if I understand what you're talking about with dustwinkling correctly. (I just sat down on my couch to test that and I did slightly see them after trying for 60 seconds.) What I see when I am seeing them are innumerable pinpoints of light moving randomly, sun colored - like white-hot-white

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nice. What kind of optical effect do you think it is?

      Delete
    2. I think i used the wrong phrase. I was referring to an effect like this - https://www.sciencefocus.com/the-human-body/what-are-the-wiggly-things-i-see-in-my-eyes-when-i-look-at-the-sky/

      Does this describe what you see?

      "tiny dots in their field of vision that follow squiggly lines. These move in sync with our pulse, briefly accelerating with every heartbeat, and they usually disappear after about a second."

      I haven't noticed the pulse thing but it could be describing what I see. This article says it's white blood cells absorbing blue light.

      Delete
    3. This does seem to be it. Interesting. Thanks for the link. Going to examine them with this in mind, that they're white blood cells. Haven't noticed the pulse thing either.

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Here is the wikipedia page on it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_field_entoptic_phenomenon

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interested to know if the simulation there matches your experience, as it does mine.

      Delete
    2. The simulation doesn't show them as dense as I see them, but this does seem to be what I'm seeing. Thanks for the Wikipedia link. How did you find out it?

      Delete
    3. I don't remember, because it was so many years ago, but I think that I noticed they were most visible when looking at blue sky, and I suspected it was blood, which allowed me to zero in on it with search terms.

      I also have my own theory that the fractal construction of our own eyes influences our tendency to see fractals when on psychedelics, because we are just more conscious of our always-existing "grid" that we impose on visual input.

      Delete
    4. I should also mention that when I first saw the fireflies, I had a more mystical explanation, similar to yours. It wasn't until years later that I bothered to look for a scientific one.

      Delete
    5. "I also have my own theory that the fractal construction of our own eyes influences our tendency to see fractals when on psychedelics, because we are just more conscious of our always-existing "grid" that we impose on visual input."

      Interesting. That makes sense to me.

      "I should also mention that when I first saw the fireflies, I had a more mystical explanation, similar to yours. It wasn't until years later that I bothered to look for a scientific one."

      Nice. Yes. It's been fun and a good mental exercise, not knowing the mechanism and having the freedom to speculate.

      Delete
  5. I see them frequently, my ex-girlfriend introduced me to them over a decade ago and confidently informed me that they are Prana (translated from Sanskrit as “life force energy”) Prana is said to reside in the air as well as pulsing through our bodies. I feel this theory is compatible with the blue field entoptic phenomenon discussed above.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Someone made a video about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2-ZP4CTgLQ

      Delete
    2. More interesting info from here: https://newearth.media/optical-anomaly-or-metaphysical-phenomenon-theories-about-the-white-orbs-in-the-sky/

      "However, the metaphysical explanation, first detailed by theosophist C. W. Leadbeater in 1927, asserts that the white moving balls are “vitality globules”; vitality being, in essence, the force that’s generated primarily from sunlight and other elemental sources.

      “Many a man, looking out towards the distant horizon, especially over the sea, will notice against the sky any number of the tiniest possible points of light dashing about in all directions with amazing rapidity. These are the vitality globules, each consisting of seven physical atoms, specks charged with that force that the Hindus call prana. It is often exceedingly difficult to be certain of the exact shade of meaning attached to these Sanskrit terms, because the Indian method of approaching these studies is so different from our own; but I think we may safely take prana as the equivalent to our vitality.” – C. W. Leadbeater, The Chakras

      The colorless vitality globules are apparently drawn into the chakras, and each of the seven atoms that compose the globule take on a different color. These colors are processed by a different area, or spoke, of the chakra (red, orange, yellow, green, blue, violet, and rose), and are distributed within the body wherever their specific color frequency is needed."

      Delete
    3. They misidentify floaters in that article. They are solidified clumps of vitreous fluid inside of the eyeball.

      Delete
    4. Thanks for those links. I like that people have noticed these in the past and tried to come up with explanations.

      Delete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wilhelm Reich described these! I'm surprised no one has yet mentioned that fact; it's a sad sign of how little he's actually read these days. (Of course Snopesian "sceptics" dismiss him as a charlatan, but that's just a further recommendation. He was a real scientist and physician, brilliantly insightful, exceptionally brave, of course not infallible, and now certainly ripe for a revival.)

    In my mid-20s, I read Reich's description of this phenomenon with delight and gratefulness and instant recognition. I had seen these tiny transient dancing lights myself as a kid, especially on sunny days at the seaside when the sky was clear & blue and the air was "alive", and now, suddenly, I could see them again.

    Reich interpreted them as manifestations of the universal cosmic proto-life-energy he called "orgone". His interest in these "microfireflies" marked the beginning of an extraordinary new stage in his life and work ("the orgone experiments").

    Myron Sharaf's biography, Fury on Earth, is a fascinating and very readable introduction to Reich. Sharaf knew Reich personally. The Function of the Orgasm is imo the first of Reich's own works anyone should read.

    - Many thanks for Trip, btw. I was moved especially by the last chapter. I look forward to reading Leave Society.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you for this comment. Wilhelm Reich sounds good.

    ReplyDelete
  9. A few other people have commented on the fact that Wilhelm Reich discovered this phenomenon as well. I wanted to add some details on how he discovered it and what his observations were, along with the observations of some others which are corroborative. I'm largely sourcing from a textbook, "Life Force, The Scientific Basis," a textbook by MIT and Princeton trained physics PhD Claude Swanson. Claude Swanson believes Prana, Chi, Orgone Energy, and torsion all refer to the same subtle energy that pervades all space.

    Wilhelm Reich discovered these particles by looking into an "Orgone Accumulator" [1]. He placed an eyepiece on the box and peered inside after adapting his eyes to darkness for a half hour. He observed the particles expanding, contracting, and spiraling.

    A.E. Powell was a Theosophist and studied ancient yogic teachings. He said [2]:

    "The force of Prana radiates from the sun and enters some of the atoms in the atmosphere and causes them to glow...This form is known as the Vitality Globule and is [exceedingly brilliant...they] can be seen by almost anyone who cares to look, darting about the atmosphere in immense numbers, especially on a sunny day."

    Choa Kok Sui, a prolific Pranic healer whose abilities were studied under controlled conditions, said [3]:

    "Air prana, solar prana, and ground prana are made of 'white' or general prana. Air and ground pranas are called vitality globules in esoteric parlance, because, when they are seen clairvoyantly by a person with slightly more sensitive eyes, they appear as small spheres or globules of light."

    Rich Berry sketched these particles, and I uploaded his image here: https://imgur.com/a/zFLtHJj

    Ivan Shakhparonov, a Russian physicist and engineer, built a "Moebius band," which he believes is capable of extracting subtle energy from the ether, following the work of Kosyrev in torsion engineering. This Moebius band can extract luminous particles. [4]

    Barbara Brennan, a western spiritual healer, said [5]:

    "Visual observations reveal the field to be highly organized in a series of geometric points, isolated pulsating points of light, spirals, webs of lines, sparks and clouds. It pulsates and can be sensed by touch, taste, smell, and luminosity..."

    Overall, it seems like there are several, independent sources who believe these microfireflies could be visual signatures of subtle energy.

    1: You can find specific details about how to construct these boxes by reading the Orgone Accumulator Handbook by James DeMeo. Or you could watch this Vice video where they made one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtqnYVtj1J0
    2: The Etheric Double-Thea Health Aura by AE Powell
    3: Advanced Pranic Healing by Choa Kok Sui
    4: Kosyrev-Dirac Emanation: Methods of Detecting and Interaction with Matter by IM Shakhparonov
    5: Hands of Light by Barbara Brennan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Wilhelm Reich discovered these particles by looking into an "Orgone Accumulator"."

      I have to correct this. Reich had noticed the dancing lights in the sunshine and fresh air before he ever conceived or built the accumulator or conducted any experiments with it.

      Delete
    2. You're right, he noticed them in his lab as well. I should have said he was able to isolate these particles using an orgone accumulator. Thank you for the correction.

      Delete
  10. Thank you for all this. What about the white blood cell explanation, though? It seems to fit what all these people are describing.

    I've been encountering stuff about Kozyrev and torsion through my research on UFOs/aliens. I'm convinced that there is energy that can extracted "from the ether"—energy that I reference in my book as "free energy," and that is being used secretly on Earth to produce antigravity, among other technologies—but I'm not sure if that energy is connected to microfireflies/dustwinkling. The white blood cell explanation made me think not.

    ReplyDelete
  11. From what I can tell, the differences between the white blood cell theory's predictions and the prana energy predictions:

    1) These people report the white globules corkscrew and do not follow the same paths repeatedly. Your capillaries, on the other hand, are not corkscrew shaped and remain in the same place.
    2) These people report not just white trails but also slower moving black particles, which aren't explained by white blood cells in the capillaries.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The corkscrew effect could be due to the capillaries being 3D, and so the white blood cells moving always also partly away from or toward one's vision. I haven't noticed if the paths stay the same or not for me. Going to examine more.

      The video I linked has an explanation for the black particles; it says they're due to the back-up red blood cells absorbing the light. I haven't noticed the black particles, but my partner has.

      There could be two phenomena, but wouldn't they overlap for some people, producing two types of dots of light? That could be possible.

      Delete
    2. Your explanation for the corkscrew effect makes sense. I’m interested to hear if they stay in the same place for you.

      Did your partner notice the black particles following the white trails, or moving separately? I think if it were red blood cells they would look like “tails” rather than separate particles, which is what Rich Berry reported.

      I think they could be two phenomena that overlap. I think the orgone accumulator experiment might be interesting to conduct too, because it doesn't seem to require a white background or filtering to see.

      Delete
    3. Another difference could be whether you see microfireflies in the center of your vision, or if they're only in the periphery.

      Delete
    4. Not sure re partner. Will ask.

      So far, I haven't noticed a lack of microfireflies in the center of my vision. Will keep looking.

      Delete
  12. Thanks to those who've pointed out that the phenomenon was observed & described by at least a few other scholars before Reich. This is fascinating.

    The ophthalmologists' "visible capillaries" explanation is backed up with serious scientific argument & evidence and at least superficially plausible; but (please correct me if I'm wrong) it's still just a hypothesis, i.e., not yet proven to have explained the phenomenon fully, if at all.

    One of Reich's main heresies was that the quality & accuracy of an observation is dependent on the vitality of the observer. How would one conduct an experiment to see if healthy children can more easily perceive the dancing lights than (say) lab technicians or CIA agents or TV journalists or professional Fact Checkers?

    Btw, I've also seen Reich's observations explained (away) by physicists & astronomers, who dismissed the "dancing lights" confidently as mere "cosmic particles", as if this were a refutation and not a confirmation. If nothing else, this demonstrates that physicists rarely communicate with eye-doctors, and that TheScience™ is both more monolithic and more fragmented than ever.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If people breathe freely and live & move healthily in the sunshine and fresh air, it must also affect their metabolism and the quality of both their blood and their eyesight.

      Exactly what are we absorbing and expelling when we breathe in and out? What are we participating in?

      Delete
    2. Yes, it is still just a theory, it seems. When I was telling my partner that Reich theorized he was seeing some kind of energy that pervades the universe, and that it seemed like Reich was describing what later people have called "free energy," she suggested that the white blood cell theory could be invented to distract people from the possible reality of being able to see free energy, since free energy is suppressed. I wouldn't be too surprised if this were the case.

      Delete
    3. I wouldn't be surprised either. God knows they have demonstrably been pushing disinfo in many fields for many decades now, and their power to "shape" understanding is now greater than ever. See the ongoing "covid" scam & coup for just one current example of anti-science fuelled by billions of dollars and sold to the world by means of 24/7 media fearporn.

      Still, the ophthalmologists' hypothesis is serious on its face and should be addressed scientifically. But unless and until the phenomenon can be proven to be _wholly_ entoptic (i.e. located solely within the eye), Reich's "orgone" hypothesis can't be dismissed. He did explicitly consider the possibility that he was observing something similar to "floaters", before going on to establish that the lights could still be observed in a blacked-out room at night. (He sat in the dark in his lab for hours to conduct that simple experiment, the kind of thing most scientists would regard as beneath their dignity and a waste of their valuable time.) Which would appear to prove that the "blue field entoptic phenomenon" is visible even without a "blue field" (or any external light-source).

      And he certainly did succeed in collecting _some_ kind of energy from the ambient air.

      PS It's worth remembering, and it seems relevant, that the white blood-cell count is one sure marker of a body's vitality.

      PPS Has anyone here tried the blue-glass experiment shown in those videos? If so, what did you see?

      Delete
    4. Btw, here's a very positive review of Leave Society by John Pistelli, a blogger I greatly like and respect, and not an easy man to please:

      https://johnpistelli.com/2021/08/17/tao-lin-leave-society/

      Delete
    5. I like Reich's experimentation. I've noticed the microfireflies/dustwinkling are visible against non-blue backgrounds, like my closet, which is white, and clouds.

      Thanks for the link to that review, which I hadn't seen.

      Delete
    6. 'When I was telling my partner that Reich theorized he was seeing some kind of energy that pervades the universe, and that it seemed like Reich was describing what later people have called "free energy," she suggested that the white blood cell theory could be invented to distract people from the possible reality of being able to see free energy, since free energy is suppressed. I wouldn't be too surprised if this were the case.'

      Theories aren't inventions. They are educated guesses, looking for proof. Have you and your partner now turned theories into conspiracies?

      I can't begin to fathom the paranoid mental straitjackets you two must strain against in the daily course of your lives.

      It seems positively bug-house. Maybe 'psychiatrically worrisome' is a more polite way of saying it.

      Delete
  13. I have seen these since college, for some 10+ years. When I first saw them my heart sank, as I thought something was wrong, and went to the eye-doctor. He told me something similar to what's described here as: Blue field entoptic phenomenon. Though I don't remember him using that name. I experience them most on a cloudless day with a bright blue sky. They take up the entire field, and shoot in small, 1/4" bursts, in every direction, and then disappear. Almost like static on a TV screen, but more sparse (though more dense than the simulation provided in this thread). I also have a lot of floaters in both of my eyes, though I don't know if this is related. I had always thought of it as something inside the mechanics of my eyes, as opposed to the "free energy" described here, though it is interesting to think about it another way. --- I enjoy your books, all the best ---

    ReplyDelete